![The Litigation Psychology Podcast - Episode 217 - Cross-Examining Expert Witnesses](https://pbcdn1.podbean.com/imglogo/image-logo/7558051/csi_podcast_litigpsy_1400x1400-min_300x300.jpg)
Monday Jun 03, 2024
The Litigation Psychology Podcast - Episode 217 - Cross-Examining Expert Witnesses
Holly Howanitz, Managing Partner, Tyson & Mendes joins Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. to talk about cross-examination of expert witnesses. Holly highlights that you need think about your goals when cross-examining expert witnesses especially since experts often have more experience testifying than a fact witness. Bill and Holly talk about strategic decisions such as when to bring up "bombs" for the expert either at deposition or at trial and how to approach preparing for cross-examining an expert. Holly shares how she prepares for an arrogant expert or an expert that does primarily work for the plaintiff's side. Bill and Holly also talk about preparing experts for the defense and what that process is like. Watch the video of this episode: https://www.courtroomsciences.com/r/fO6
Comments (0)
To leave or reply to comments, please download free Podbean or
No Comments
To leave or reply to comments,
please download free Podbean App.